Econophysics Research by Victor Yakovenko
Publication Profiles
Research Grants
Computer Animation and Visualization
Video Recordings of My Talks
- 2 June 2004: University of California at Santa Barbara, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics Colloquium, "Statistical Mechanics of Money, Income, and Wealth",
Viewgraphs, Video, and Audio online
- 13 May 2009: University of California at Santa Barbara, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics Colloquium, "New Developments in Statistical Mechanics of Money, Income, and Wealth", Viewgraphs, Video, Audio, and Animation online
- 26 January 2010: University of Maryland, Department of Physics Colloquium
"New Developments in Statistical Mechanics of Money, Income, and Wealth", Viewgraphs,
Video and Audio online (1 hour 28 minutes)
-
28 May 2020: University of Thessaly, Greece, guest lecture "Economic Inequality from a Statistical Physics Point of View" in Econophysics Course, Zoom recording (2 hours 15 minutes)
-
16 June 2020: Oxford University, Department of Physics Colloquium, "Economic Inequality from a Statistical Physics Point of View", Zoom recording (55 minutes)
-
23 June 2020: Invited Talk "Economic Inequality from a Statistical Physics Point of View" at the conference
Thermodynamics 2.0, Massachusetts, viewgraphs, Zoom recording (28 minutes)
-
7 December 2020: Invited Talk "Economic Inequality from a Statistical Physics Point of View" at the Conference on Complex Systems, Greece, Zoom recording (30 minutes)
-
24 June 2021: Invited Talk "Economic Inequality from a Statistical Physics Point of View" in the seminar series on Physics and Public Policy at Department of Physics, American University of Beirut, Lebanon, Zoom recording (1 hour 40 minutes) on YouTube
Coverage in the Media
-
Brian Hayes, "Follow the Money",
American Scientist, v. 90, pp. 400-405 (2002),
pdf
-
Greg Price, op-ed column
"Lies and
Statistics" in Australian Financial
Review newspaper, 1 March 2003, p. 51 (text)
-
Chapter 8.4 "The Heston model: a model with volatility fluctuations
and skew" in the book
"Theory of Financial Risk and Derivative Pricing: from Statistical Physics to
Risk Management" by Jean-Philippe Bouchaud and Marc Potters
(Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2003) summarizes our paper
[2.1].
-
Chapter 20.3 "Origin of Heavy Tails" in the book
"Path Integrals
in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, Polymer Physics, and Financial
Markets" by Hagen Kleinert (World Scientific, 3rd edition, 2004)
reproduces our paper [2.1].
-
Jenny Hogan,
"Why it is hard to share the wealth",
New Scientist, issue 2490, 12 March 2005, page 6
-
Christopher Shea,
"Econophysics", in a special issue "The Year in Ideas" of
The New York Times Magazine, 11 December 2005, page 67
-
Greg Price, op-ed column
"Lies and
Statistics" in Australian Financial
Review newspaper, 7 January 2006, p. 63 (text)
-
Steven Brush,
"Economics+Physics=Econophysics!",
The Faculty Voice, an independent faculty newspaper, University of Maryland,
Vol. 21, No. 3, March 2008, p. 5
-
J. R. van Meter,
"On the distribution of money and ability",
Science 2.0 Blog, 28 August 2009
-
Christine Evans-Pughe,
"We should treat money like energy...",
Engineering and Technology Magazine, volume 6, issue 6, 13 June 2011, pages 41-43, publication of the UK Institution of Engineering and Technology
-
Phillip Schewe,
"Inequality and Investment Bubbles: A Clearer Link is Established", press release of the Joint Quantum Institute, 29 April 2012
-
Video interview
"What Causes Inequality? An Econophysics Approach" conducted by Perry Mehrling at the annual conference of INET in Hong Kong on 4 April 2013
-
Phillip Schewe,
"The Entropy of Nations", press release of the Joint Quantum Institute, 2 January 2014,
carried by many online news outlets, including EurekAlert!, Phys.org, The Statesman newspaper of Kolkata, India, etc.
-
TV interview on
Brian Lehrer's show in the Public Intellectual segment starting around minute 40, conducted at the CUNY studio in New York on 3 February 2014
-
TV appearance in Season 5 Episode 3
"Is Poverty Genetic?" of the series Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman on Science Channel, recorded in Washington DC on 22 October 2013, first broadcast on 4 June 2014, time segment 15:45 - 21:40 on
YouTube
-
Adrian Cho,
"Physicists say it's simple", Science magazine, 23 May 2014, vol. 344, no. 6186, p. 828, in the special issue The Science of Inequality
-
Referenced in Alexis Goldstein's Opinion
"The Trouble With GameStop Is That the House Still Wins", New York Times, 1 February 2021
-
Nathanial Gronewold's book
"Anthill Economics: Animal Ecosystems and the Human Economy",
Ch. 3 "Entropy and Inequality" and
Conclusions.
Papers
1. Economic Inequality from a Statistical Physics Perspective
-
[1.1] "Statistical mechanics of money" by
A. A. Dragulescu and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published:
The European Physical Journal B, v. 17, pp. 723-729
(2000), PDF,
cond-mat/0001432,
RePEc
-
Computer Animation Video by Justin Chen
-
Computer Simulations in Mathematica by Ian Wright
-
Abstract:
In a closed economic system, money is conserved. Thus, by analogy with energy, the equilibrium probability distribution of money must follow the exponential Gibbs law characterized by an effective temperature equal to the average amount of money per economic agent. We demonstrate how the Gibbs distribution emerges in computer simulations of economic models. Then we consider a thermal machine, in which the difference of temperatures allows one to extract a monetary profit. We also discuss the role of debt, and models with broken time-reversal symmetry for which the Gibbs law does not hold.
-
[1.2] "Evidence for the exponential distribution of income in the USA"
by A. A. Dragulescu and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published:
The European Physical Journal B, v. 20, pp. 585-589 (2001),
PDF,
cond-mat/0008305,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
Using tax and census data, we demonstrate that the distribution of individual income in the USA is exponential. Our calculated Lorenz curve without fitting parameters and Gini coefficient 1/2=50% agree well with the data. From the individual income distribution, we derive the distribution function of income for families with two earners and show that it also agrees well with the data. The family data for the period 1947-1994 fit the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient 3/8=37.5% calculated for two-earners families.
-
[1.3] "Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth
and income in the United Kingdom and the United States" by
A. A. Dragulescu and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published:
Physica A, v. 299,
pp. 213-221 (2001),
PDF,
cond-mat/0103544,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
We present the data on wealth and income distributions in the United Kingdom, as well as on the income distributions in the individual states of the USA. In all of these data, we find that the great majority of population is described by an exponential distribution, whereas the high-end tail follows a power law. The distributions are characterized by a dimensional scale analogous to temperature. The values of temperature are determined for the UK and the USA, as well as for the individual states of the USA.
-
[1.4] "Statistical Mechanics of Money, Income, and
Wealth: A Short Survey" by A. A. Dragulescu and
V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published:
Modeling of Complex Systems: Seventh Granada Lectures,
AIP Conference Proceedings 661, New York, 2003,
pp. 180-183, PDF,
cond-mat/0211175,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
In this short paper, we overview and extend the results of our papers
cond-mat/0001432,
cond-mat/0008305, and
cond-mat/0103544, where we use an analogy with statistical physics to describe probability distributions of money, income, and wealth in society. By making a detailed quantitative comparison with the available statistical data, we show that these distributions are described by simple exponential and power-law functions.
-
[1.5] "Temporal evolution of the `thermal' and `superthermal'
income classes in the USA during 1983-2001" by
A. C. Silva and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published:
Europhysics Letters, v. 69, pp. 304-310 (2005),
PDF,
cond-mat/0406385,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
Personal income distribution in the USA has a well-defined two-class structure. The majority of population (97-99%) belongs to the lower class characterized by the exponential Boltzmann-Gibbs ("thermal") distribution, whereas the upper class
(1-3% of population) has a Pareto power-law ("superthermal") distribution. By analyzing income data for 1983-2001, we show that the "thermal" part is stationary in time, save for a gradual increase of the effective temperature, whereas the "superthermal" tail swells and shrinks following the stock market. We discuss the concept of equilibrium inequality in a society, based on the principle of maximal entropy, and quantitatively show that it applies to the majority of population.
-
[1.6] "Two-class structure of income
distribution in the USA: Exponential bulk and power-law tail" by
V. M. Yakovenko and A. C. Silva
-
Published: In the book "Econophysics of Wealth
Distributions", edited by A. Chatterjee, S. Yarlagadda, and
B. K. Chakrabarti (2005, Springer series "New Economic Windows",
ISBN 88-470-0329-6), pp. 15-23
-
Abstract: Conference proceedings paper based on
[1.5].
-
[1.7] "A study of the personal income distribution in Australia" by
A. Banerjee, V. M. Yakovenko, and T. Di Matteo
-
Published:
Physica A, v. 370, pp.
54-59 (2006), PDF,
physics/0601176,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
We analyze the data on personal income distribution from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. We compare fits of the data to the exponential, log-normal, and gamma distributions. The exponential function gives a good (albeit not perfect) description of 98% of the population in the lower part of the distribution. The log-normal and gamma functions do not improve the fit significantly, despite having more parameters, and mimic the exponential function. We find that the probability density at zero income is not zero, which contradicts the log-normal and gamma distributions, but is consistent with the exponential one. The high-resolution histogram of the probability density shows a very sharp and narrow peak at low incomes, which we interpret as the result of a government policy on income redistribution.
-
[1.8] "Universal patterns of inequality"
by A. Banerjee and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published: New
Journal of Physics 12, 075032 (2010),
PDF.
arXiv:0912.4898,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
We study probability distributions of money, income, and energy consumption per capita for ensembles of economic agents. Following the principle of entropy maximization for partitioning of a limited resource, we find exponential distributions for the investigated variables. We also discuss fluxes of money and population between two systems with different money temperatures. For income distribution, we study a stochastic process with additive and multiplicative components. The resultant income distribution interpolates between exponential at the low end and power-law at the high end, in agreement with the empirical data for USA. We discuss how the increase of income inequality in USA in 1983-2007 results from dramatic increase of the income fraction going to the upper tail and exceeding 20% of the total income. Analyzing the data from the World Resources Institute, we find that the distribution of energy consumption per capita around the world is reasonably well described by the exponential function. Comparing the data for 1990, 2000, and 2005, we discuss the effects of globalization on the inequality of energy consumption.
-
[1.9] "Global inequality in energy consumption from 1980 to 2010"
by S. Lawrence, Q. Liu, and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published: Entropy 15, 5565-5579 (2013),
PDF,
arXiv:1312.6443,
RePEc
-
Computer animation of historical evolution of
global inequality
-
Abstract:
We study the global probability distribution of energy consumption per capita around the world using data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) for 1980-2010. We find that the Lorenz curves have moved up during this time period, and the Gini coefficient G has decreased from 0.66 in 1980 to 0.55 in 2010, indicating a decrease in inequality. The global probability distribution of energy consumption per capita in 2010 is close to the exponential distribution with G=0.5. We attribute this result to the globalization of the world economy, which mixes the world and brings it closer to the state of maximal entropy. We argue that global energy production is a limited resource that is partitioned among the world population. The most probable partition is the one that maximizes entropy, thus resulting in the exponential distribution function. A consequence of the latter is the law of 1/3: the top 1/3 of the world population consumes 2/3 of produced energy. We also find similar results for the global probability distribution of CO2 emissions per capita.
-
[1.10] "Monetary economics from econophysics perspective"
by V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published: The European Physical Journal Special Topics 225, 3313-3335 (2016), in the issue
Discussion and Debate: Can Economics be a Physical Science?,
PDF,
arXiv:1608.04832,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
This is an invited article for the Discussion and Debate special issue of The European Physical Journal Special Topics on the subject "Can Economics Be a Physical Science?" The first part of the paper traces the personal path of the author from theoretical physics to economics. It briefly summarizes applications of statistical physics to monetary transactions in an ensemble of economic agents. It shows how a highly unequal probability distribution of money emerges due to irreversible increase of entropy in the system. The second part examines deep conceptual and controversial issues and fallacies in monetary economics from econophysics perspective. These issues include the nature of money, conservation (or not) of money, distinctions between money vs. wealth and money vs. debt, creation of money by the state and debt by the banks, the origins of monetary crises and capitalist profit. Presentation uses plain language understandable to laypeople and may be of interest to both specialists and general public.
-
[1.11] "Exponential structure of income inequality: evidence from 67 countries"
by Yong Tao, Xiangjun Wu, Tao Zhou, Weibo Yan, Yanyuxiang Huang, Han Yu, Benedict Mondal, and Victor M. Yakovenko
-
Published: Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 14, 345-376 (2019), online January 2017,
PDF,
arXiv:1612.01624,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
Economic competition between humans leads to income inequality, but, so far, there has been little understanding of underlying quantitative mechanisms governing such a collective behavior. We analyze datasets of household income from 67 countries, ranging from Europe to Latin America, North America and Asia. For all of the countries, we find a surprisingly uniform rule: Income distribution for the great majority of populations (low and middle income classes) follows an exponential law. To explain this empirical observation, we propose a theoretical model within the standard framework of modern economics and show that free competition and Rawls fairness are the underlying mechanisms producing the exponential pattern. The free parameters of the exponential distribution in our model have an explicit economic interpretation and direct relevance to policy measures intended to alleviate income inequality.
-
[1.12] "Historical evolution of global inequality in carbon emissions and footprints versus redistributive scenarios"
by Gregor Semieniuk and Victor M. Yakovenko
-
Published: Journal of Cleaner Production 264, 121420 (2020),
PDF,
arXiv:2004.00111,
RePEc
-
Computer animation of historical evolution of
global inequality
-
Abstract:
Ambitious scenarios of carbon emission redistribution for mitigating climate change in line with the Paris Agreement and reaching the sustainable development goal of eradicating poverty have been proposed recently. They imply a strong reduction in carbon footprint inequality by 2030 that effectively halves the Gini coefficient to about 0.25. This paper examines feasibility of these scenarios by analyzing the historical evolution of both weighted international inequality in CO2 emissions attributed territorially and global inequality in carbon footprints attributed to end consumers. For the latter, a new dataset is constructed that is more comprehensive than existing ones. In both cases, we find a decreasing trend in global inequality, partially attributed to the move of China from the lower to the middle part of the distribution, with footprints more unequal than territorial emissions. These results show that realization of the redistributive scenarios would require an unprecedented reduction in global inequality far below historical levels. Moreover, the territorial emissions data, available for more recent years up to 2017, show a saturation of the decreasing Gini coefficient at a level of 0.5. This observation confirms an earlier prediction based on maximal entropy reasoning that the Lorenz curve converges to the exponential distribution. This saturation further undermines feasibility of the redistributive scenarios, which are also hindered by structural tendencies that reinforce carbon footprint inequality under global capitalism. One way out of this conundrum is a fast decarbonization of the global energy supply in order to decrease global carbon emissions without relying crucially on carbon inequality reduction.
-
[1.13] "Physics-inspired analysis of the two-class income distribution in the USA in 1983-2018"
by Danial Ludwig and Victor M. Yakovenko
-
Published: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 380, 20210162 (2022),
PDF,
arXiv:2110.03140,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
The first part of this paper is a brief survey of the approaches to economic inequality based on ideas from statistical physics and kinetic theory. These include the Boltzmann kinetic equation, the time-reversal symmetry, the ergodicity hypothesis, entropy maximization and the Fokker-Planck equation. The origins of the exponential Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution and the Pareto power law are discussed in relation to additive and multiplicative stochastic processes. The second part of the paper analyses income distribution data in the USA for the time period 1983-2018 using a two-class decomposition. We present overwhelming evidence that the lower class (more than 90% of the population) is described by the exponential distribution, whereas the upper class (about 4% of the population in 2018) by the power law. We show that the significant growth of inequality during this time period is due to the sharp increase in the upper-class income share, whereas relative inequality within the lower class remains constant. We speculate that the expansion of the upper-class population and income shares may be due to increasing digitization and non-locality of the economy in the last 40 years.
This article is part of the theme issue "Kinetic exchange models of societies and economies".
2. Stochastic Volatility Models for Stock-Price Fluctuations
-
[2.1] "Probability distribution of returns in the Heston model with stochastic
volatility" by A. A. Dragulescu and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published:
Quantitative Finance, v. 2, pp. 443-453 (2002),
PDF.
Erratum:
Quantitative Finance, v. 3, p. C15 (2003),
PDF
-
Preprint:
cond-mat/0203046,
RePEc,
PDF.
Viewgraphs:
vertical.pdf,
horizontal.pdf,
-
Abstract:
We study the Heston model, where the stock price dynamics is governed by a geometrical (multiplicative) Brownian motion with stochastic variance. We solve the corresponding Fokker-Planck equation exactly and, after integrating out the variance, find an analytic formula for the time-dependent probability distribution of stock price changes (returns). The formula is in excellent agreement with the Dow-Jones index for time lags from 1 to 250 trading days. For large returns, the distribution is exponential in log-returns with a time-dependent exponent, whereas for small returns it is Gaussian. For time lags longer than the relaxation time of variance, the probability distribution can be expressed in a scaling form using a Bessel function. The Dow-Jones data for 1982–2001 follow the scaling function for seven orders of magnitude.
-
[2.2] "Comparison between the probability distribution of returns in
the Heston model and empirical data for stock indexes" by
A. C. Silva and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published:
Physica A 324, 303-310 (2003),
PDF,
cond-mat/0211050
-
Abstract:
We compare the probability distribution of returns for the three major stock-market indexes (Nasdaq, S&P500, and Dow-Jones) with an analytical formula recently derived by
Dragulescu and Yakovenko for the Heston model with stochastic variance. For the period of 1982-1999, we find a very good agreement between the theory and the data for a wide range of time lags from 1 to 250 days. On the other hand, deviations start to appear when the data for 2000-2002 are included. We interpret this as a statistical evidence of the major change in the market from a positive growth rate in 1980s and 1990s to a negative rate in 2000s.
-
[2.3] "Exponential distribution of financial
returns at mesoscopic time lags: a new stylized fact"
by A. C. Silva, R. E. Prange, and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published:
Physica A 344, 227-235 (2004),
PDF
-
Preprint:
cond-mat/0401225,
RePEc,
PDF.
Presentation:
PPT.
-
Abstract:
We study the probability distribution of stock returns at mesoscopic time lags (return horizons) ranging from about an hour to about a month. While at shorter microscopic time lags the distribution has power-law tails, for mesoscopic times the bulk of the distribution (more than 99% of the probability) follows an exponential law. The slope of the exponential function is determined by the variance of returns, which increases proportionally to the time lag. At longer times, the exponential law continuously evolves into Gaussian distribution. The exponential-to-Gaussian crossover is well described by the analytical solution of the Heston model with stochastic volatility.
-
[2.4] "Stochastic volatility of financial markets as the fluctuating rate of
trading: an empirical study" by A. C. Silva, and V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published:
Physica A 382,
278-285 (2007), PDF
-
Preprint:
physics/0608299,
PDF.
Presentation:
PPT.
-
Abstract: We present an empirical study of the subordination hypothesis for a stochastic time series of a stock price. The fluctuating rate of trading is identified with the stochastic variance of the stock price, as in the continuous-time random walk (CTRW) framework. The probability distribution of the stock price changes (log-returns) for a given number of trades N is found to be approximately Gaussian. The probability distribution of N for a given time interval Dt is non-Poissonian and has an exponential tail for large N and a sharp cutoff for small N. Combining these two distributions produces a nontrivial distribution of log-returns for a given time interval Dt, which has exponential tails and a Gaussian central part, in agreement with empirical observations.
3. Reviews Papers and Books on Econophysics
-
[3.1] "Applications of physics to economics and finance: Money, income, wealth,
and the stock market" by A. A. Dragulescu
-
Posted: (2003)
cond-mat/0307341,
PDF.
-
Abstract: Ph.D. thesis in physics defended on May 15, 2002 at the
University of Maryland. It covers the papers [1.1-1.4, 2.1] listed above
and contains extra material. (30 pages, 30 figures)
-
[3.2] "Research in econophysics" by V. M. Yakovenko
-
Posted: (2003)
cond-mat/0302270,
RePEc,
PDF.
-
Abstract:
Review of econophysics research in the group of Victor Yakovenko written for the online newspaper published by the Department of Physics, University of Maryland:
The Photon, Issue 24, January-February 2003
-
[3.3] "Applications of physics to finance and economics: returns,
trading activity and income" by A. Christian Silva
-
Posted: (2005)
physics/0507022,
PDF.
-
Abstract: Ph.D. thesis in physics defended on May 10, 2005 at the University of Maryland. It covers the papers [2.2-2.3, 1.5] listed above and contains much additional material. (24 pages, 45 figures)
-
[3.4] "Statistical Mechanics Approach to Econophysics" by V. M.
Yakovenko
-
Posted: (2007)
arXiv:0709.3662,
RePEc,
PDF.
-
Published: in
Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, edited by R. A. Meyers, Springer
1st edition 2009,
ISBN 978-0-387-75888-6
PDF,
2nd edition 2022,
ISBN 978-3-642-27737-5
-
Abstract: This invited review article surveys statistical models for money, wealth, and income distributions developed in the econophysics literature since late 1990s.
(24 pages, 11 figures, 144 citations)
-
[3.5] Book "Classical Econophysics" by A. F. Cottrell, P. Cockshott, G. J. Michaelson, I. P. Wright, and V. M.
Yakovenko
-
Published: Routledge (2009), ISBN 978-0-415-47848-9, series Advances in Experimental and Computable Economics.
-
Abstract:
This monograph examines the domain of classical political economy using the methodologies developed in recent years both by the new discipline of econophysics and by computing science. This approach is used to re-examine the classical subdivisions of political economy: production, exchange, distribution and finance. Covering a combination of techniques drawn from three areas, classical political economy, theoretical computer science and econophysics, to produce models that deepen our understanding of economic reality, this new title will be of interest to higher level doctoral and research students, as well as scientists working in the field of econophysics. (384 pages)
-
[3.6] "Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income" by V. M.
Yakovenko and J. B. Rosser, Jr.
-
Published:
Reviews of Modern Physics
81, 1703 (2009),
PDF,
arXiv:0905.1518,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
The paper reviews statistical models for money, wealth, and income distributions developed in the econophysics literature since the late 1990s. By analogy with the Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution of energy in physics, it is shown that the probability distribution of money is exponential for certain classes of models with interacting economic agents. Alternative scenarios are also reviewed. Data analysis of the empirical distributions of wealth and income reveals a two-class distribution. The majority of the population belongs to the lower class, characterized by the exponential ("thermal") distribution, whereas a small fraction of the population in the upper class is characterized by the power-law ("superthermal") distribution. The lower part is very stable, stationary in time, whereas the upper part is highly dynamical and out of equilibrium.
-
[3.7] "Statistical mechanics of money, debt, and energy consumption" by V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published: Science and Culture 76 (9-10), 430-436 (2010),
invited paper to the
Special Issue on Econophysics,
arXiv:1008.2179,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
We briefly review statistical models for the probability distribution of money developed in the econophysics literature since the late 1990s. In these models, economic transactions are modeled as random transfers of money between the agents in payment for goods and services. We focus on conceptual foundations for this approach, on the issues of money conservation and debt, and present new results for the energy consumption distribution around the world.
-
[3.8] "Statistical mechanics approach to the probability distribution of money" by V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published: Chapter 7 in the book New Approaches to Monetary Theory: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Heiner Ganssmann, ISBN 978-0-415-59525-4, Routledge (2011), pages 104-123, Routledge series International Studies in Money and Banking, proceedings of the workshop Money - Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Department of Sociology, Free University of Berlin, 25-27 June 2009.
arXiv:1007.5074,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
This invited Chapter reviews statistical models for the probability distribution of money developed in the econophysics literature since the late 1990s. In these models, economic transactions are modeled as random transfers of money between the agents in payment for goods and services. Starting from the initially equal distribution of money, the system spontaneously develops a highly unequal distribution of money analogous to the Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution of energy in physics. Boundary conditions are crucial for achieving a stationary distribution. When debt is permitted, it destabilizes the system, unless some sort of limit is imposed on maximal debt.
-
[3.9] "Applications of statistical mechanics to economics: Entropic origin of the probability distributions of money, income, and energy consumption" by V. M. Yakovenko
-
Published: Chapter 4 in the book Social Fairness and Economics: Economic essays in the spirit of Duncan Foley, edited by Lance Taylor, Armon Rezai, and Thomas Michl, ISBN 978-0-415-53819-0, Routledge (2013), pages 53-82, Routledge series Frontiers of Political Economy, proceedings of the symposium in honor of Duncan K. Foley on occasion of his 70th birthday at the Department of Economics, New School for Social Research, New York, 20-21 April 2012.
arXiv:1204.6483,
RePEc
-
Abstract:
This Chapter is written for the Festschrift celebrating the 70th birthday of the distinguished economist Duncan Foley from the New School for Social Research in New York. This Chapter reviews applications of statistical physics methods, such as the principle of entropy maximization, to the probability distributions of money, income, and global energy consumption per capita. The exponential probability distribution of wages, predicted by the statistical equilibrium theory of a labor market developed by Foley in 1996, is supported by empirical data on income distribution in the USA for the majority (about 97%) of population. In addition, the upper tail of income distribution (about 3% of population) follows a power law and expands dramatically during financial bubbles, which results in a significant increase of the overall income inequality. A mathematical analysis of the empirical data clearly demonstrates the two-class structure of a society. Empirical data for the energy consumption per capita around the world are close to an exponential distribution, which can be also explained by the entropy maximization principle.
-
[3.10] "Modeling sustainability: population, inequality, consumption, and bidirectional coupling of the Earth and Human Systems" by S. Motesharrei, J. Rivas, E. Kalnay, G. R. Asrar, A. J. Busalacchi, R. F. Cahalan, M. A. Cane, R. R. Colwell, K. Feng, R. S. Franklin, K. Hubacek, F. Miralles-Wilhelm, T. Miyoshi, M. Ruth, R. Sagdeev, A. Shirmohammadi, J. Shukla, J. Srebric, V. M. Yakovenko, and N. Zeng
-
Published: National Science Review 3, 470-494 (2016).
PDF
-
Research Highlight: Bojie Fu and Yan Li, National Science Review 3, 397-398 (2016)
-
Media Release: Oxford University Press
-
Abstract:
Over the last two centuries, the impact of the Human System has grown dramatically, becoming strongly dominant within the Earth System in many different ways. Consumption, inequality, and population have increased extremely fast, especially since about 1950, threatening to overwhelm the many critical functions and ecosystems of the Earth System. Changes in the Earth System, in turn, have important feedback effects on the Human System, with costly and potentially serious consequences. However, current models do not incorporate these critical feedbacks. We argue that in order to understand the dynamics of either system, Earth System Models must be coupled with Human System Models through bidirectional couplings representing the positive, negative, and delayed feedbacks that exist in the real systems. In particular, key Human System variables, such as demographics, inequality, economic growth, and migration, are not coupled with the Earth System but are instead driven by exogenous estimates, such as United Nations population projections. is makes current models likely to miss important feedbacks in the real
Earth-Human system, especially those that may result in unexpected or counterintuitive outcomes, and thus requiring different policy interventions from current models. e importance and imminence of sustainability challenges, the dominant role of the Human System in the Earth System, and the essential roles the Earth System plays for the Human System, all call for collaboration of natural scientists, social scientists, and engineers in multidisciplinary research and modeling to develop coupled Earth-Human system models for devising effective science-based policies and measures to benefit current and future generations.
-
[3.11] "Statistical physics perspective on economic inequality" by V. M. Yakovenko
-
To be Published: in the upcoming Routledge Handbook of Complexity Economics (2024).
arXiv:12307.02470
-
Abstract:
This article is a supplement to my main contribution to the Routledge Handbook of Complexity Economics (2023). On the basis of three recent papers, it presents an unconventional perspective on economic inequality from a statistical physics point of view. One section demonstrates empirical evidence for the exponential distribution of income in 67 countries around the world. The exponential distribution was not familiar to mainstream economists until it was introduced by physicists by analogy with the Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution of energy and subsequently confirmed in empirical data for many countries. Another section reviews the two-class structure of income distribution in the USA. While the exponential law describes the majority of population (the lower class), the top tail of income distribution (the upper class) is characterized by the Pareto power law, and there is no clearly defined middle class in between. As a result, the whole distribution can be very well fitted by using only three parameters. Historical evolution of these parameters and inequality trends are analyzed from 1983 to 2018. Finally, global inequality in energy consumption and CO2 emissions per capita is studied using the empirical data from 1980 to 2017. Global inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient G, has been decreasing until around 2010, but then saturated at the level G=0.5. The saturation at this level was theoretically predicted on the basis of the maximal entropy principle, well before the slowdown of the global inequality decrease became visible in the data. This effect is attributed to accelerated mixing of the world economy due to globalization, which brings it to the state of maximal entropy and thus results in global economic stagnation. This observation has profound consequences for social and geopolitical stability and the efforts to deal with the climate change.
4. Invited Book Reviews
-
[4.1] Review of the book The Physics of Wall Street: A Brief History of Predicting the Unpredictable (2013) by James Owen Weatherall
-
Published in Physics Today 66, August 2013, p. 50
Presentations
- Remotely on Zoom:
-
Wesleyan University, Department of Physics
Colloquium, Middletown, CT, 2 April 2020
-
University of Thessaly, Greece, guest lecture in Econophysics Course, 28 May 2020, video recording (2 hours 15 minutes)
-
Harvard Kennedy School,
Center for International Development,
Seminar at The Growth Lab, 1 June 2020
-
Oxford University, Department of Physics Colloquium, 16 June 2020, video recording (55 minutes)
-
Invited Talk at the conference
Thermodynamics 2.0, Massachusetts, 23 June 2020, viewgraphs, video recording (28 minutes)
-
University of Maryland, Lecture for the Society of Physics Students (SPS), Department of Physics,
College Park, 4 December 2020
-
Invited Talk at the
Conference on Complex Systems, Greece, 7 December 2020, video recording (30 minutes)
-
University of New Hampshire, Department of Physics and Astronomy
Colloquium, Durham, 12 February 2021
-
Invited talk in seminar series Physics and Public Policy, Department of Physics, American University of Beirut, Lebanon, 24 June 2021, Zoom recording (1 hour 40 minutes) on YouTube
-
Contributed talk at WEHIA workshop, Milan, Italy, 28 June 2021
-
Contributed talk at ECINEQ conference, London School of Economics, 10 July 2021
-
Invited talk at the
Econophysics Colloquium conference, Lyon, France, 27-28 October 2021
-
Wake Forest University, two guest lectures in the course ECN 271-P Econophysics
for economics, physics, and environmental majors, Winston-Salem, NC, 1 and 3 March 2022
-
Invited talk at International Symposium of Physics,
Monterrey Institute of Technology, Mexico, 20 May 2022
-
Contributed talk at international conference Thermodynamics 2.0,
Boone, NC, 18 July 2022
- At conferences (in person):
-
Applications of Physics in
Financial Analysis, 15-17 July 1999, Dublin, Ireland
Proceedings:
International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, Vol. 3, No. 3 (July
2000)
-
Applications of Physics in Financial Analysis 2, 13-15 July
2000, Liege, Belgium
Proceedings:
The European Physical Journal B, Vol. 20, No. 4 (April II 2001)
-
NATO
Advanced Research Workshop on Application of Physics in Economic
Modelling, 8-10 February 2001, Prague, Czech Republic
Proceedings:
Physica A, Vol. 299, No. 1-2 (1 October 2001)
-
Scaling
Concepts and Complex Systems, 9-14 July 2001, Merida, Yucatan,
Mexico
-
21st
International Conference on Statistical Physics, 15-21 July
2001, Cancún, México
-
Horizons in
Complex Systems, 5-8 December 2001, Messina, Italy
-
Applications of Physics in Financial
Analysis 3, 5-7 December 2001, London, England
-
Workshop on Economics and Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, 29 May - 2
June 2002, the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical
Physics, Trieste, Italy
-
International
Conference "Computing in Economics and Finance", 26-30 June
2002, Aix-en-Provence, France
-
International Econophysics Conference, 28-31 August 2002, Bali,
Indonesia
Proceedings:
Physica A, Vol. 324, No. 1-2 (1 June 2003)
-
7th Granada
Seminar on Computational and Statistical Physics, 2-7
September 2002, Granada, Spain
Proceedings: Modeling of Complex
Systems: Seventh Granada Lectures,
AIP Conference Proceedings 661, New York, 2003.
-
Applications of Physics
in Financial Analysis 4, 13-15 November 2003, Warsaw,
Poland
Proceedings:
Physica A, Vol. 344, No. 1-2 (1 December 2004)
-
Monterrey Institute of Technology, Mexico, 6th International Symposium
of Physics, 26 February 2004
-
9th Workshop on
Economics and Heterogeneous Interacting Agents (WEHIA2004),
27-29 May 2004, Kyoto University, Japan
-
North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational
Science, NAACSOS Conference 2004, 27-29 June 2004, Carnegie
Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
-
Volatility of Financial Markets: Theoretical Models, Forecasting and
Trading, 18-29 October 2004, Lorentz Center, Leiden
University, The Netherlands
Yakovenko's talk: "Thermal" and "superthermal" two-class structure of
the personal income distribution
Silva's talk: Exponential distribution of financial returns at
mesoscopic time lags: a new stylized fact
Prange's talk: Volatility of the forecasted drift: Stocks and Options
-
Econophysics of Wealth Distributions, 15-19 March 2005, Saha
Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, India.
Talk 1: Two-class structure of income distribution in the USA:
exponential bulk and power-law tail
Talk 2: Statistical mechanics of money, income, and wealth:
foundations and applications
Proceedings: "Econophysics of Wealth Distributions", edited by
A. Chatterjee, S. Yarlagadda, and B. K. Chakrabarti (2005, Springer
series "New Economic Windows",
ISBN 88-470-0329-6).
- Interdisciplinary workshop Emergence
at the Pacific Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, 15-18 May 2005.
- Symposium on Understanding Complex
Systems, 16-19 May 2005, Department of Physics, University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Talk: "Statistical Mechanics of Money, Income, and Wealth",
slides,
audio.
-
11th Conference on Computing in Economics and Finance of the
Society for Computational Economics, Washington, DC, 23-25 June
2005.
-
Econophysics Conference, Australian National University, Canberra,
Australia, 14-18 November 2005.
-
75th Annual Meeting of the Southern Economic Association,
Washington, DC, 18-20 November 2005.
-
International Workshop
Topological Aspects of Critical and Network Systems, Sapporo, Japan, 13-14 February 2006.
-
Focus Session on Econophysics, March Meeting of the American Physical Society,
Baltimore, Maryland, 13 March 2006.
-
5th International Conference
Applications of Physics in Financial Analysis (APFA-5), Turin, Italy,
29 June - 1 July, 2006
Proceedings:
Physica A, Vol. 382, Issue 1, Pages 1-358 (1 August 2007) and
The European Physical Journal B, Vol. 57, No. 2, Pages 121-224 (May II
2007)
-
University of Maryland, Third Feynman Festival,
29 August 2006
-
Conference on Fat
Tails from Finance to Fluids, Dublin, Ireland, 21 - 27 May 2007
-
ESHIA/WEHIA Conference, Center
for Social Complexity, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, 18 - 19
June 2007
-
Winter Meeting on
Statistical Physics, Taxco (Guerrero), Mexico, 8 - 11 January 2008
-
Conference on Data in
Complex Systems, Palermo, Italy, 6 - 9 April 2008
-
Chairing a session at the conference Transdisciplinary Perspectives on
Economic Complexity, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, 17 May 2008
-
Conference on
Probabilistic Political Economy, Kingston University, London, 14 - 17 July 2008
-
Working group Universal Diversity Patterns Across the Sciences, Santa Fe Institute, New Mexico, 24 February 2009
-
Econophys - Kolkata IV conference, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, 9 - 13 March 2009
- International Symposium on Neural Networks and Econophysics: from superconducting junctions to financial markets, Department
of Physics and Business School, Loughborough University, UK,
14 June 2009
-
Workshop Money - Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Free University of Berlin, Germany, 25 - 27 June 2009
-
Annual Meeting of AAAS,
invited talk in the session
"What
Went Wrong with the Global Economy?", San Diego, 19 February 2010
-
March Meeting of the American Physical Society, Portland, Oregon, 16 March 2010
-
Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, Oakland, California, 8 April 2010
-
Statistical Mechanics Conference, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, 9 May 2010
-
General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth (IARIW), St.Gallen, Switzerland, 26 August 2010
-
Mediterranean School on Nano-Physics, Marrakech, Morocco, sponsored by ICTP, Trieste, 11 December 2010
-
Info-Metrics across the Sciences, Info-Metrics Institute, Department of Economics, American University, Washington DC, 2 May 2011
-
8th International Conference on
Complex Systems, New England Complex Systems Institute, Boston, 29 June 2011
-
Dynamic Days Conference, Baltimore, 6 January 2012
-
Symposium in honor of Duncan K. Foley, Department of Economics, New School for Social Research, New York, 20 April 2012
-
General Conference of IARIW, Boston,
9 August 2012
-
Econophysics Colloquium, ETH Zurich, 11 September 2012
-
Annual Conference of the Society of Government Economists, George Washington University, Washington DC, 6 November 2012
-
Econophysics Colloquium and
Asia Pacific Econophysics Conference, Asia Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Korea, 30 July 2013
-
Models from Statistical Mechanics in Applied Sciences, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, UK, 9 September 2013
-
Statistical modeling, financial data analysis and applications, Palazzo Franchetti, Venice, Italy, 13 September 2013
-
Modeling and Control in Social Dynamics, Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University Camden, NJ,
6-9 October 2014
-
Recent Innovations in Info-Metrics, Info-Metrics Institute, Department of Economics, American University, Washington DC, 31 October - 1 November, 2014
-
Dupont Summit on Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy Issues, Washington, DC, 5 December 2014
-
Collective Dynamics and Model Verification, School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 17-19 April 2015
-
Annual Conference of the Society of Government Economists, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 21 May 2015
- Minisymposium
Wealth Distribution and Statistical Equilibrium in Economics at AMMCS-CAIMS Congress, Waterloo, Canada, 7-12 June 2015
- Granada Seminar
Physics Meets the Social Sciences, La Herradura, Spain, 15-19 June 2015
-
Workshop in Honor of the Life and Work of Richard Prange, Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany, 21-26 June 2015
-
Asia-Pacific Econophysics Conference, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 13-15 July 2015
-
Econophysics and Sociophysics, Jawaharlal Nehru University and University of Delhi, India, 27 November - 1 December 2015
-
Annual Conference of Eastern Economic Association, Washington, DC, 25-28 February 2016
-
Annual Conference of the Society of Government Economists, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC, 13 May 2016
-
Physics and Social Network Dynamics of the Markets, Nordita, Stockholm, Sweden, 30 May - 3 June 2016
-
BioPhysical Economics, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, 26-29 June 2016
-
International Congress on
Agent Computing, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 29-30 November 2016
-
Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society of Applied and Industrial Mathematics (CAIMS 2017), Halifax, Canada, 16-22 July 2017
-
Annual Conference of the International Confederation of Associations for Pluralism in Economics (ICAPE), Philadelphia, 4 January 2018
-
Program Statistical techniques for correlation analysis: Quantum Many-Body Systems and more and Conference RMT, Complex Networks and Applications, Centro Internacional de Ciencias, Cuernavaca, Mexico, 15-21 July 2018
-
Computer Simulations in Physics and Beyond, Moscow, Russia, 27 September 2018
-
Inequality, Entropy, and Econophysics, Columbia University, New York City, 30-31 May 2019
-
8th conference of the Society for the Study of Economic Inequality (ECINEQ), Paris School of Economics, 3-5 July 2019
-
Global Innovation Forum, National Economic University and Foundation for Armenian Science and Technology (FAST), Yerevan, Armenia, 16-18 October 2019
- Seminars (in person):
-
University of Maryland, Condensed Matter Physics Seminar, September 1999
-
Oxford University, Theoretical Condensed Matter Physics Seminar, September 1999
-
Princeton University, Condensed Matter Physics Seminar, April
2000
-
University of Maryland, Seminar on Interdisciplinary Problems in
Physics and Chemistry, October 2000
-
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques, Orsay,
France, February 2001
-
Boston University, Condensed Matter Physics Seminar, March 2001
-
University of Maryland, "Foundations and Frontiers of Physics" seminar
for graduate students, April 2001
-
University of Maryland, Statistics Seminar, Mathematics Department,
September 2001
-
Santa Fe Institute, October 2001
-
University of Maryland,
Physics Colloquium, January 2002
-
University of Maryland, Statistics Seminar, Mathematics Department,
April 2002
-
University of Maryland, Informal Statistical
Physics Seminar, IPST, April 2002
- University of Maryland, Department of Finance, 13 September
2002
-
JHU Applied Physics Laboratory (Maryland),
Colloquium,
10 January 2003
-
George Mason University, Fairfax VA, School of Computational Sciences,
General Colloquium, 16 October 2003
-
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, Sigma Xi Colloquium, 7
January 2004
-
University of Maryland, "Foundations and Frontiers of Physics" seminar
for graduate students, 9 February 2004
-
Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California at
Santa Barbara,
Colloquium
(Viewgraphs, Video, and Audio online), 2 June 2004
-
Instituto de Fisica Teorica, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP),
Sao Paulo, Brasil, Colloquium, 6 August 2004
-
NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Laboratory for Solar and Space Physics,
Greenbelt, Maryland, 16 December 2005
-
The Brookings Institution,
joint seminar of the Center on Social and Economic Dynamics and the
Globalization and Inequality Group, Washington, DC,
17 January 2006
-
Department of Economics, New School for Social Research,
New York, 17 April 2006
-
University of Maryland, "Foundations and Frontiers of Physics" seminar
for graduate students, 24 April 2006
-
Georgetown University, Department of Physics
Colloquium,
19 September 2006
-
Center for Social Complexity,
George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, 23 March 2007
-
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, 20 March 2008
-
Department of Economics, New School for Social Research, New York, 5 May 2008
-
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques, Orsay,
France, 16 October 2008
-
Keynote talk at the celebration the 60th anniversary of the Economics Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy, 3 November 2008
-
Santa Fe Institute, SFI Seminar, 15 January 2009
-
Center for Nonlinear Studies (CNLS) colloquium,
Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2 February 2009
-
Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California at
Santa Barbara,
Colloquium
(Viewgraphs, Video, Audio, and Animation online), 13 May 2009
-
Seminar at the Chair of Quantitative Finance, Ecole Centrale Paris, France, 2 July 2009
-
Janelia Farm Research Campus of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Northern Virginia, 4 January 2010
-
University of Maryland, Physics Research Seminar for undergraduate physics majors, 6 January 2010
-
Indiana University at Bloomington, Seminar at the Biocomplexity Institute, 12 January 2010
-
Stanford University, Physics Department
Colloquium, 19 January 2010
-
University of Maryland, Physics Colloquium
(Viewgraphs, Video, and Audio on Vimeo), 26 January 2010
-
Howard University, Colloquium at the Department of Physics and Astronomy, Washington DC, 31 March 2010
-
Johns Hopkins University, Colloquium at the Department of Physics and Astronomy, Baltimore, Maryland, 29 April 2010
-
Nasdaq QMX, Seminar at the Economics Research Division, Rockville, Maryland, 14 June 2010
-
University of North Carolina, Colloquium at the Department of Physics and Astronomy, Chapel Hill, 10 January 2011
-
American University, Economics Department and Info-Metrics Institute, Washington, DC, 14 September 2011
-
Syracuse University, Physics Department Colloquium, 19 January 2012
-
University of Maryland, Department of Mathematics, seminar series Aspects of Statistical Mechanics with Applications, 6 February 2012
-
American Center for Physics, APS Mid-Atlantic Senior Physicists Group, College Park, Maryland, 22 February 2012
-
New York University, Physics Department Colloquium, 19 April 2012
-
Washington University in St. Louis, Physics Department Colloquium, 2 May 2012
-
Johns Hopkins University, Economics and Finance Club, 26 September 2012
-
George Mason University, Department of Mathematical Sciences,
Applied and Computational Mathematics seminar, 19 October 2012
-
Catholic University of America, Physics Department Colloquium, 31 October 2012
-
University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Physics Department Colloquium, 10 January 2013
-
University of Florida, Gainesville, Physics Department Colloquium, 17 January 2013
-
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Physics Department Colloquium, 28 January 2013
-
University of Maryland, Foundations and Frontiers of Physics seminar
for graduate students, 13 February 2013
-
Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Lecture, 29 May 2013
-
Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Research Seminar, 31 May 2013
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Physics Department Colloquium, 28 August 2013
-
University of Maryland, CSCAMM/KI-Net Seminar, 4 September 2013
-
University of Waterloo, Department of Physics and Astronomy Colloquium, Canada, 31 October 2013
-
American University, Washington DC, Physics Colloquium, 26 February 2014
-
Texas A&M University, College Station, Physics Department
Colloquium, 20 March 2014
-
Rutgers University, Piscataway, Physics Department
Colloquium, 30 April 2014
-
Graduate School of the City University of New York (CUNY), 12 May 2014
-
New School for Social Research, New York, Department of Economics Seminar,
13 May 2014
-
Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET), New York, 14 May 2014
-
University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), Physics Department
Colloquium, 10
September 2014
-
National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC),
Seminar, Annapolis, MD, 27 January 2015
-
Laboratoire de Physique Theorique et Modeles Statistiques,
Seminar, Orsay, France, 8 April 2015
-
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics,
Seminar,
Viewgraphs,
Video and Audio online, Waterloo, Canada, 10 June 2016
-
Queens College, Physics Department
Colloquium, New York, 2 November 2015
-
Indian Institute of Management, Seminar, Ahmedabad, India, 2 December 2015
-
Beijing Normal University, School of Systems Science,, Seminar, 4 December 2015
-
George Mason University, Computational Materials Science Center Colloquium, Fairfax, VA, 18 April 2016
-
University of California at Irvine, Physics Department Colloquium, 21 April 2016
-
University of Basel, Physics Department Colloquium, Switzerland, 27 May 2016
-
University of Maryland, Saturday Morning Physics talk, 22 October 2016
-
Tufts University, Mathematics Department Colloquium and Philosophical Fridays seminar, Department of Philosophy, Boston, 4 November 2016
-
University of Utah, Physics Department Colloquium, Salt Lake City, 19 January 2017
-
Wayne State University, Physics Department Colloquium, Detroit, 7 September 2017
-
George Washington University, Department of Philosophy,
guest lecture in PHIL 2281 Philosophy of the Environment, Washington, DC, 12 October 2017
-
University of Maryland, Saturday Morning Physics talk, 28 October 2017
-
University of Maryland, Geography Department, seminar series Climate Change and Social Inequality, 28 November 2017
-
Peking University, Institute of New Structural Economics, Beijing, China, 27-29 December 2017
-
University of Maryland, Applied Dynamics Seminar, 1 March 2018
-
University of Toledo, Department of Physics and Astronomy
Colloquium, Ohio, 24 January 2019
-
Rice University, Department of Physics and Astronomy
Colloquium, Houston, 20 March 2019
-
University of Maryland, Condensed Matter Theory Center seminar, 14 May 2019
-
Columbia University, Financial Engineering Practitioners Seminar, Center for Financial Engineering, New York, 16 September 2019
-
University of Maryland, Foundations and Frontiers of Physics seminar
for graduate students, 14 April 2022
-
Howard University, Colloquium at the Department of Physics and Astronomy, Washington DC, 1 February 2023
-
University of Maryland, Department of Mathematics, Joint REU Seminar, 20 July 2023
-
University of Maryland, Lecture for the Society of Physics Students (SPS), Department of Physics,
College Park, 29 September 2023
-
George Mason University, Department of Physics and Astronomy Colloquium,
Fairfax, Virginia, 12 April 2024
Collaborators
-
Andrew Dirr (2023-2024), undergraduate student Miami University in Oxford, Ohio
-
Danial Ludwig (2020-2022), undergraduate student UMD
-
Gregor Semieniuk (2019-2020), Assistant Research Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst
-
Yong Tao (2015-2017), Assistant Professor of Economics, College of Economics and Management,
Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
-
Benedict Mondal (2015-2018), undergraduate student UMD
-
Scott Lawrence (2013-2015), undergraduate student UMD
-
Qin Liu (2013), graduate student UMD
-
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. (2008-2009),
Professor of Economics and Kirby L. Kramer Jr. Chair of Business Administration,
James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia,
deceased 2023
Honorary Editor of the
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,
Editor-in-Chief of the journal Review of Behavioral Economics (2013-2023)
-
Anand Banerjee (2005-2008), graduate student UMD, Ph.D. 2008
-
Justin Chen (2007 summer), undergraduate student Caltech,
developed computer animation of money exchange models
-
Richard Prange (2002-2008), Professor Emeritus of Physics UMD,
deceased 2008
-
A. Christian Silva (2002-2005), graduate student UMD, Ph.D. 2005
-
Adrian Dragulescu (1997-2002), graduate student UMD, Ph.D. 2002
Links
-
Econophysics Colloquium international conference series
-
Focus Sessions on Econophysics at the March Meetings of the American Physical Society:
Last update
2024-3-10
Home page
of Victor Yakovenko